In Defense of Disciplines

This book presents a bold critique of interdisciplinarity, arguing that the value of traditional academic disciplines is often underestimated. Through various case studies, it defends their importance in scholarly research and education.

In Defense of Disciplines by Jerry Jacobs presents a thought-provoking critique of the growing trend towards interdisciplinarity in academic research and teaching. Jacobs argues that the belief in the benefits of merging traditional academic fields is largely misguided. He suggests that the perceived advantages of interdisciplinary approaches are often overstated, and that critiques of established disciplines may be misplaced. This perspective challenges the widely accepted notion that breaking down boundaries between disciplines leads to more effective research and education.

Jacobs draws on a variety of data sources to develop a new theory regarding the liberal arts disciplines, including biology, economics, and history. He emphasizes the unique organizational characteristics that contribute to the vitality and scope of these fields. Through a series of case studies, he illustrates how ideas circulate between disciplines, the emergence of interdisciplinary journals, and the development of new academic fields from existing ones. These examples serve to reinforce his argument that traditional disciplines possess inherent value and relevance that should not be overlooked.

Ultimately, Jacobs' work serves as a robust defense of the liberal arts, asserting that their enduring significance is often underestimated in the push for interdisciplinary collaboration. By offering a fresh perspective on the discourse surrounding academic boundaries, In Defense of Disciplines positions itself as a crucial resource for scholars and educators who seek to understand the complexities of academic research and the importance of maintaining distinct disciplinary identities.