Rhetoric and Reality

This Element provides evidence on how international organizations promote the protection of human rights in member states.

The number of international human rights institutions (IOs) and countries participating in them has risen dramatically. This Element demonstrates that state decisions about joining IOs depends on the institutional design of the organizations and the sovereignty costs on member states. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.The number of international human rights institutions and countries participating in them has risen dramatically in recent decades, precipitating debates about why countries make such commitments and whether these commitments improve member's human rights behavior. These debates have centered on a small number of human rights treaties, with far less attention paid to the larger number of international organizations (IOs) that aim to promote human rights. The Element argues and then demonstrates that state decisions about joining these IOs depends on the institutional design of the organizations, specifically sovereignty costs for member states. These costs stem from the constraints that IOs impose and vary substantially. Emerging democracies are most likely to enter high sovereignty cost IOs. Furthermore, organizations that generate higher sovereignty costs tend to produce better human rights outcomes than those generating fewer sovereignty costs for all regimes. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.